Broken friendships, tense atmosphere and provocations. Usually talking about politics is not very healthy when the people involved do not know how to receive contrary opinions. Parallel to this, the debate in the workplace can be even more complicated, so we separate some information about the political opinion at work. Check out.
Read more: Law that frees political propaganda is sanctioned
see more
10 rising professions for you to keep an eye on the job market
Alagoas wins the first professional master's degree in Special Education
According to the Federal Constitution of 1988, every individual has his freedom of expression assured, regardless of the circumstances or environment in which he is inserted. However, we know that uncomfortable conversations can lead to bad eyes and even dismissal.
What should we do?
Not everything should be treated in the extreme, civilized and friendly conversations can be brought in any field, including the labor one. It is recommended that everything be treated with great respect and without taking it personally. The opposite can also be a source of contention, as refraining from these subjects often contributes to an image of alienation and lack of opinion. In some work areas, avoiding a placement can be more harmful than the other way around.
My boss has a contrary opinion, should I lie?
Lying is never the best way out, as you can later contradict yourself in conversations on similar topics. In this case, the best thing is to calmly state your position and then immediately state that you respect any position. By following these steps, you will avoid lies and also leave no room for debate.
Political opinions at work cause dismissal?
It shouldn't, because, as said, free expression is backed by the Federal Constitution, however, some bosses are intolerant and some collaborators go over the limit. Anyone who is fired for political opinion can sue the courts so as not to be harmed, and may receive compensation or return to employment. However, proving that the cause of dismissal was this turns out to be difficult. This happens because many leaders do not justify the dismissal as a political divergence, but with any other more plausible reason.
