O Federal Public Ministry (MPF) wants the participants of the National High School Examination (Enem) may appeal the grades received in the exam, which is currently not provided for in the public notice. The agency filed a public civil action so that the National Institute of Educational Studies and Research Anísio Teixeira (Inep), responsible for the Enem, stipulate a deadline for students to still be able to apply in the edition from 2018.
The action was distributed to the 29th Federal Court of Rio Janeiro. The action was filed with a request for urgent relief. For the MPF, the current public notice of Enem, by not guaranteeing the right to appeal, violates constitutional norms and principles.
see more
Extra income! Learn how to earn up to R$ 768 from Enem on weekends
Applications are open for anyone who wants to work on the application of…
The Enem was applied on the 4th and 11th of November to more than 4 million students across the country. The test scores were released on November 14. Enem's individual results will be released on January 18. Only in March, after the publication of the results, students will have access to the correction of the composition for pedagogical purposes.
The MPF requests that this procedure be reviewed. In the action, the MPF requires that Inep open a period of five working days for viewing the response card of the objective tests and ten working days for participants can appeal the questions and the answer template of the exam, as well as the grades attributed due to a reading error on the registration card. response.
Regarding the wording, the MPF requires that Inep publish on the website, within ten working days, the mirror of the same. Shortly after the publication of the notes, it wants the municipality to stipulate a period of five working days for viewing the essays, not only for educational purposes, as stipulated in this notice, but also for the purposes of resource. And then open a period of ten working days for participants to appeal the score obtained in this test.
The MPF asks that, if Inep fails to comply with the deadlines, a daily fine of R$10,000 is charged. The document also demands that, as of 2019, these changes are already included in the public notice of the Enem.
According to the agency, when used as a means of accessing the university, Enem gains the status of a “public selection process for national scope" and must, therefore, obey the "constitutional principles that guide any and all functions administrative”.
“The public notices for tenders for public positions in all spheres of power, within the scope of all federative entities, provide for an appeal, as well as as the entrance exams prior to Enem also brought it, there being no justification for Inep not to insert such a rule in the National Teaching Examination Average". The MPF awaits the court's decision.
In a note, Inep says it was not notified by the MPF about the action. The autarchy also says that, according to the announcement, all participants can view their respective newsroom response cards, with their respective correction, on the Participant's Page. The view is exclusive for “pedagogical purposes, after the disclosure of the result”, as stated in the public notice.
The autarchy also argues that the correction system guaranteed to Enem participants already constitutes a kind of resource. The wording is corrected by two proofreaders. If there is a difference between the corrections, the proof may be evaluated by a third proofreader. If the difference persists, the proof is sent for evaluation by a panel of three brokers.
The calculation of the proficiencies of the participants, based on their answers to the multiple choice questions of the objective tests, will be based on the Item Response Theory (IRT). The document with the methodology used and the criteria adopted by the bank can be consulted on the Inep Portal. The information is from Agência Brasil.
