OpenAI arrives with news that displeases the public who are fans of the system. According to the positioning of Ilya Sutskever, chief researcher and co-founder of the company, disclosing the language code was a mistake they made from the beginning, he still announced that the brain of the ChatGPT, the GPT-4, will not be released.
Sutskever said that the initial attempt served so that they could learn and provide the experience to everyone, but shareholders profited from the action. He claims that the future will be composed of artificial intelligences and that there are no means to control this reality.
see more
Google develops AI tool to help journalists in…
Unopened original 2007 iPhone sells for nearly $200,000; know...
OpenAI's pronouncement left the developer public in an unfavorable light.
In an almost generalized way, programming developers took a stand against what was announced by the owner of the ChatGPT. In response to the position of not disclosing the code, Ben Schmidt, vice president of Nomic AI, said that not having access to the content can cause insecurity for its users.
I think we can call it shut on 'Open' AI: the 98 page paper introducing GPT-4 proudly declares that they're disclosing *nothing* about the contents of their training set. pic.twitter.com/dyI4Vf0uL3
— Ben Schmidt / @[email protected] (@benmschmidt) March 14, 2023
Nomic AI's CEO says that access to the artificial intelligence allows security, technology and critical issues to be built with specialists. This directly implies, as explained in the analysis, that the materials used by the AI could be easily plagiarized. Plagiarism is a criminal act, which can lead to other difficulties.
“To make informed decisions about where this model will not work, you need to have a broader sense of what assumptions have been fed into the algorithm. I would not trust an autonomous car whose training did not involve snowy climates”, analyzed Schmidt.
All the possible failures that intelligence may present become a problem with no possible solutions and that is why they released the documentation at the beginning of the trajectory. Although it seems like competition for OpenAI, when citing the actions, this could be a failure that could harm the company itself in the future.
Lover of movies and series and everything that involves cinema. An active curious on the networks, always connected to information about the web.
