Every year, the value of the contribution deposited in the Severance Indemnity Fund (FGTS) must undergo a review. For this, Caixa Econômica Federal uses the TR index (Referential Rate), which has not been updated since 1999. In this way, the worker suffers constant losses due to the absence of income from the amount on deposit. For this reason, more and more jurists and political specialists have been stimulating the debate around the FGTS review, which would be enough to deliver an average of R$ 10,000 to Brazilians.
Read more: Did you know? Pensioners are entitled to double exemption on Income Tax
see more
Is it better to eat boiled eggs for lunch or dinner? Find out here
With me-no-one-can: Meet the plant capable of warding off evil eyes
The decision on updating the review value is in the hands of the ministers of the Federal Supreme Court (STF). However, there is still no forecast for a judgment to change the reference index for the correction of values. According to the indications of the jurists, the replacement could be by the INPC, IPCA or IPCA-E, all indices that work with the measurement of inflation.
In the event of due replacement, it is likely that a large portion of Brazilians, who had a formal contract from 1999 until now, will receive a refund of R$ 10,000. However, depending on the citizen's contribution, this amount can be lower or much higher, even reaching R$ 72,000 per person.
There are several accounting companies that can provide the exact calculation for you, and this can be very useful, including, to claim an exact revision amount. Basically, these companies will calculate the wages for the years of work for the time the balance has not moved in the fund.
With this, the worker may notice that he has suffered a loss of up to R$72,000, which is the maximum amount you can receive from a review. However, if your formal work time has been shorter in recent years, this value can decrease a lot. That is, it varies according to the time of contribution and also the value that each professional received.
