The creation of OpenAI messed with the structures of large technology companies. There has been no talk of a small company that could bother Google and Microsoft, and that's what happened in the last months of 2022. ChatGPT came along and all eyes were on the new artificial intelligence. As everything has its pros and cons, launching yet another AI can have future consequences.
see more
Google Messaging: The future of cross-platform chat could be…
Confirmed: Samsung really is producing foldable screens for…
O ChatGPT it can answer any question and it can produce texts just like humans write. It is important to remember that verbal language is something purely human and to see an artificial intelligence lecturing and producing texts is something unusual.
With this novelty, other questions arise: will students stop producing texts? Can a teacher's job of explaining be replaced? Will humans, in the near future, be replaced by robots?
The creation of a non-human intelligence raises concerns for workers. Advanced technology makes use of human-like features. In the flurry of news, as we discover the future effect of ChatGPT, there is a question being raised.
If the automation of technological resources allows the absence of humans, how would the poorest, low-income workers in different countries be? Artificial intelligence would have no basis and logic without workers.
As was said by Partnership on AI, a non-profit organization, the hidden force is the movement of workers hired by large technology companies that are used for the artificial intelligence system to be adapted.
The work of these people, much of it in the Southern Hemisphere, directs AIs to do the right thing. Data, images and all the information necessary for a ChatGPT to be in operation are posted.
To the Partnership, this is a job that can lead to terribly boredom.
Using as an example the chatbot from OpenAI, which has 175 billion responses at the “tip of the tongue”, all this information use the internet as a database, but all reactions references are taught by workers.
The “labelers” (data taggers), as they are called in the technological area, teach the robot to have a similar reaction to the human.
“Despite the critical role that these data enrichment professionals play, a growing body of research reveals the precarious working conditions that these workers face”, denounced the Partnership about the work of OpenAI, creators of ChatGPT.
The Times magazine published a case that indicates precarious work of these “labelers”.
According to the newspaper, the work outsourced by OpenAI offers up to US$ 2 (converted, R$ 10) per hour to each of these labellers.
Even with Microsoft as the biggest investor in the startup, OpenAI's workforce was outsourced so that ChatGPT had the data enrichment.
After the disclosure of the complaint made by journalist Billy Perrigo, the spokesperson for OpenAI stated that the payment to the workers was carried out by the contractor. These issues, in the near future and in the present day, can generate negative effects for society.
Lover of movies and series and everything that involves cinema. An active curious on the networks, always connected to information about the web.
